The following studies have utilised the National Endoscopy Database (NED) to carry out their research. They showcase how useful a tool NED can be within clinical research alongside how NED can be utilised to improve patient safety and care quality.
Authors: Beaton D, Rutter M, Sharp L, Oppong, K, Awadelkarim, B, Everett, S, & Mitra, V DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102424 Journal: BSG Frontline Gastroenterology Year Published: 2023 This analysis assessed current endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) practice within the UK, including use of sedation and patient comfort. Improving triage in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: insights from the UK National Endoscopy Database (NED)
Authors: Beaton, D, Sharp, L, Trudgill, N. & Rutter, M DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2024-102777 Journal: BSG Frontline Gastroenterology Year Published: 2024 Beaton et al. aim to analyse data from the UK National Endoscopy Database (NED) to investigate factors associated with endotherapy in patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) . Diagnostic yield from symptomatic gastroscopy in the UK: British Society of Gastroenterology analysis using data from the National Endoscopy Database
Authors: Beaton, D, Sharp, L, Lu, L, Trudgill, N, Thoufeeq, M, Nicholson, B, Rogers, P, Docherty, J, Jenkins, A, Morris, A, Rösch, T, & Rutter, M DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332071 Journal: BSG Gut Year Published: 2024 This national analysis aimed to calculate the diagnostic yield from gastroscopy for common symptoms, guiding improved resource utilisation. Diagnostic yield from symptomatic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in the UK: A British Society of Gastroenterology analysis using data from the National Endoscopy Database
Authors: Beaton, D, Sharp, L, Lu, L, Trudgill, N, Thoufeeq, M, Nicholson, B, Rogers, P, Docherty, J, Jenkins, A, Morris, A, Rösch, T, & Rutter, M DOI: 10.1111/apt.18003 Journal: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Year Published: 2024 Beaton et al. aim to determine the diagnostic outcomes of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for common symptoms.UK endoscopy workload and workforce patterns: is there potential to increase capacity? A BSG analysis of the National Endoscopy Database
Authors: Beaton, D, Sharp, L, Trudgill, N, Thoufeeq, M, Nicholson, B, Rogers, P, Docherty, J, Penman, I, & Rutter, M DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102145 Journal: BSG Frontline Gastroenterology Year Published: 2023 Evaluation of NED to inform service planning, exploring opportunities to expand capacity to meet service demands. Case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps per 100 procedures: a new candidate gold standard colonoscopy key performance indicator
Authors: Catlow, J, Lu, L, Sharp, L, Rutter, M, & NED APRIQOT Trialists Group DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001743 Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterology Year Published: 2025 Adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been criticised as a colonoscopy key performance indicator (KPI), for excluding serrated polyps, requiring histological data and fostering a ‘one-and-done’ attitude. Catlow et al. hypothesised that a case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps (aMNP) would address these criticisms and provide a better measure of colonoscopy quality. Catlow et al. aimed to develop an aMNP using the National Endoscopy Database (NED) and assess its relationship with quality metrics. Nationally Automated Colonoscopy Performance Feedback Increases Polyp Detection: The NED APRIQOT Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors: Catlow, J, Sharp, L, Wagnild, J, Lu, L, Bhardwaj-Gosling, R, Ogundimu, E, Kasim, A, Brookes, M, Lee, T, McCarthy, S, Gray, J, Sniehotta, F, Valori, R, Westwood, C, McNally, R, Ruwende, J, Sinclair, S, Deane, J, NED APRIQOT Trialists Group,& Rutter, M DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.048 Journal: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Year Published: 2024 Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are higher for endoscopists with low polyp detection rates. Using the UK’s National Endoscopy Database (NED), which automatically captures real-time data, Catlow et al. assessed if providing feedback of case-mix–adjusted mean number of polyps (aMNP), as a key performance indicator, improved endoscopists’ performance. Feedback was delivered via a theory-informed, evidence-based audit and feedback intervention. Wind of change: what can we learn from the National Endoscopy Database? Authors: Chilton, A, Dziedziak, O, Jones, S & Verma, A DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102294 Journal: BSG Frontline Gastroenterology Year Published: 2023 This article describes the opportunity, to describe, design and deliver success using the intelligence extracted from the National Endoscopy Database (NED) analysis. Development of a national automated endoscopy database: The United Kingdom National Endoscopy Database (NED)
Authors: Lee, T, Siau, K, Esmaily, S, Docherty, J, Stebbing, J, Brookes, M, Broughton, R, Rogers, P, Dunckley, P, & Rutter, M DOI: 10.1177/2050640619841539 Journal: United European Gastroenterology Journal Year Published: 2019 This article describes the development and implementation process of NED from its inception to date. What is the current provision of service for gastrostomy insertion in England?
Authors: Parr, H, Williams, E, White, S, Thompson, N, McAlindon, M, Hopper, A, McKinlay, A & Sanders, D DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102154. Journal: BSG Frontline Gastroenterology Year Published: 2023 Significant morbidity and mortality can be associated with gastrostomy insertion, likely influenced by patient selection, indication and aftercare. Parr et al. aimed to establish what current variation in practice exists and how this has improved by comparison to their previously published British Society of Gastroenterology survey of 2010. Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience
Authors: Shiha, M, Al-Rifaie, A & Thoufeeq, M DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000699 Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterology Year Published: 2021 Colonoscopy withdrawal time (CWT) is a key performance indicator affecting polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, studies have shown wide variation in CWT and ADR between different endoscopists. The National Endoscopy Database (NED) was implemented to enable quality assurance in all endoscopy units across the UK and also to reduce variation in practice. Shiha, Al-Rifaie & Thoufeeq aimed to assess whether CWT changed since the introduction of NED and whether CWT affected PDR. |